John Lamble vs Marvin Bernardo Spiering Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamble vs Spiering analysis and find out who is favored!
John Lamble vs Marvin Bernardo Spiering Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lamble 1 - 0 Spiering
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamble has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Spiering has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamble, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Spiering has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamble has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Spiering has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamble has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Spiering winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamble has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 135/ 89), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Spiering has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 7/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 26/ 20).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lamble winning 1 times and Spiering being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lamble winning 2 and Spiering winning 0. The last match between Lamble and Spiering was at the Mexico F3 (Cordoba), 09-05-2017, First, Hard with John Lamble getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamble and Spiering have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lamble winning 0 times and Spiering 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lamble winning 1, and Spiering 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamble has played against opponents with an average rank of while Spiering has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamble has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Spiering has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamble has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Spiering has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
781
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (146-105)
Career Total W/L
59% (35-24)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | John Lamble | Marvin Bernardo Spiering |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:0 | 1:38:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (37/62) | 59% (44/74) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (28/37) | 70% (31/44) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 30% (9/30) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 46% (34/74) | 34% (21/62) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(2) 6-2 |
John Lamble
Player
Marvin Bernardo Spiering
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | John Lamble | Marvin Bernardo Spiering |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
John Lamble Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
John Lamble
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Pavel Krainik
Player
John Lamble
47%
(
40 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
John Lamble
Player
Alejandro Hoyos
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
John Lamble
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
John Lamble
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Marvin Bernardo Spiering Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
Marvin Bernardo Spiering
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
R1 |
John Lamble
Player
Marvin Bernardo Spiering
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H |
view more